Endless Flight Posted November 14, 2007 Author Posted November 14, 2007 Sorry, I deleted the old thread by accident when I was moving this. Please use this for OOC discussion. :)
Endless Flight Posted November 14, 2007 Posted November 14, 2007 Sorry, I deleted the old thread by accident when I was moving this. Please use this for OOC discussion. :)
Endless Flight Posted November 14, 2007 Author Posted November 14, 2007 Sorry, I deleted the old thread by accident when I was moving this. Please use this for OOC discussion. :)
Shadow Posted November 16, 2007 Posted November 16, 2007 I did it once myself. I think it has something to do with the ghost thread left behind. If we delete ghost threads I think it will delete the original thread.
Shadow Posted November 16, 2007 Posted November 16, 2007 I did it once myself. I think it has something to do with the ghost thread left behind. If we delete ghost threads I think it will delete the original thread.
Shadow Posted November 16, 2007 Posted November 16, 2007 I did it once myself. I think it has something to do with the ghost thread left behind. If we delete ghost threads I think it will delete the original thread.
Shadowboxer Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 I'm just making a Sense Motive check, in case Liam finds something amiss.
Shadowboxer Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 I'm just making a Sense Motive check, in case Liam finds something amiss.
Shadowboxer Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 I'm just making a Sense Motive check, in case Liam finds something amiss.
Shadow Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 I will be gone from the 19th to the 24th. I will see if another Ref has time to continue for me. I will post as soon as I can.
Shadow Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 I will be gone from the 19th to the 24th. I will see if another Ref has time to continue for me. I will post as soon as I can.
Shadow Posted November 18, 2007 Posted November 18, 2007 I will be gone from the 19th to the 24th. I will see if another Ref has time to continue for me. I will post as soon as I can.
Barnum Posted November 19, 2007 Posted November 19, 2007 I'll be glad to help out until Tuesday (them I'm on vacation). What else did you have in mind here?
Barnum Posted November 19, 2007 Posted November 19, 2007 I'll be glad to help out until Tuesday (them I'm on vacation). What else did you have in mind here?
Barnum Posted November 19, 2007 Posted November 19, 2007 I'll be glad to help out until Tuesday (them I'm on vacation). What else did you have in mind here?
Shadowboxer Posted November 19, 2007 Posted November 19, 2007 I was thinking of several possible scenarios. Either something is troubling Master Lee and he's covering it up, hence the Sense Motive check. Or, the Master Lee we're seeing now is an imposter or . . . I really don't know - I was leaving it for Referees to come up with the conflict. Either way, I was hoping to take on a room full of goons or something similar. :twisted: Hopefully that makes sense.
Shadowboxer Posted November 19, 2007 Posted November 19, 2007 I was thinking of several possible scenarios. Either something is troubling Master Lee and he's covering it up, hence the Sense Motive check. Or, the Master Lee we're seeing now is an imposter or . . . I really don't know - I was leaving it for Referees to come up with the conflict. Either way, I was hoping to take on a room full of goons or something similar. :twisted: Hopefully that makes sense.
Shadowboxer Posted November 19, 2007 Posted November 19, 2007 I was thinking of several possible scenarios. Either something is troubling Master Lee and he's covering it up, hence the Sense Motive check. Or, the Master Lee we're seeing now is an imposter or . . . I really don't know - I was leaving it for Referees to come up with the conflict. Either way, I was hoping to take on a room full of goons or something similar. :twisted: Hopefully that makes sense.
Toptomcat Posted November 19, 2007 Posted November 19, 2007 For instance, he may have some threat in mind that will require two heroes to take care of. Something to keep in mind if any of you Refs want to run something.
Toptomcat Posted November 19, 2007 Posted November 19, 2007 For instance, he may have some threat in mind that will require two heroes to take care of. Something to keep in mind if any of you Refs want to run something.
Toptomcat Posted November 19, 2007 Posted November 19, 2007 For instance, he may have some threat in mind that will require two heroes to take care of. Something to keep in mind if any of you Refs want to run something.
Shadowboxer Posted November 20, 2007 Posted November 20, 2007 For instance, he may have some threat in mind that will require two heroes to take care of. Something to keep in mind if any of you Refs want to run something. I concur.
Recommended Posts