Veiled Malice Posted February 6, 2008 Author Posted February 6, 2008 Geez, two nat 20's on that run through. These guys want it, that's for sure. Okay, they are now using the Zig-Zag maneuver, this time in Close Terrain. There's no +2 for you here, and you have to make an initial obstacle roll with a DC of 18 if you roll a 17 or more. You use Acrobatics to avoid the obstacle if you fail.
Veiled Malice Posted February 6, 2008 Author Posted February 6, 2008 Geez, two nat 20's on that run through. These guys want it, that's for sure. Okay, they are now using the Zig-Zag maneuver, this time in Close Terrain. There's no +2 for you here, and you have to make an initial obstacle roll with a DC of 18 if you roll a 17 or more. You use Acrobatics to avoid the obstacle if you fail.
Veiled Malice Posted February 6, 2008 Author Posted February 6, 2008 Geez, two nat 20's on that run through. These guys want it, that's for sure. Okay, they are now using the Zig-Zag maneuver, this time in Close Terrain. There's no +2 for you here, and you have to make an initial obstacle roll with a DC of 18 if you roll a 17 or more. You use Acrobatics to avoid the obstacle if you fail.
Thevshi Posted February 6, 2008 Posted February 6, 2008 Rolled and posted before I saw this. I rolled a 24 with the +2, so that is 22 without it.
Thevshi Posted February 6, 2008 Posted February 6, 2008 Rolled and posted before I saw this. I rolled a 24 with the +2, so that is 22 without it.
Thevshi Posted February 6, 2008 Posted February 6, 2008 Rolled and posted before I saw this. I rolled a 24 with the +2, so that is 22 without it.
Veiled Malice Posted February 6, 2008 Author Posted February 6, 2008 Okay, so you're a bit behind now. Just goes to show what good luck does for you, I guess. I'll get back to this tonight.
Veiled Malice Posted February 6, 2008 Author Posted February 6, 2008 Okay, so you're a bit behind now. Just goes to show what good luck does for you, I guess. I'll get back to this tonight.
Veiled Malice Posted February 6, 2008 Author Posted February 6, 2008 Okay, so you're a bit behind now. Just goes to show what good luck does for you, I guess. I'll get back to this tonight.
Thevshi Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 And once more with a bad roll. But I guess if I am to roll badly on something, Initiative is the place for tha to be A 38
Thevshi Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 And once more with a bad roll. But I guess if I am to roll badly on something, Initiative is the place for tha to be A 38
Thevshi Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 And once more with a bad roll. But I guess if I am to roll badly on something, Initiative is the place for tha to be A 38
Thevshi Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 And bad rolls continue, hopefully he's flat footed. I don't know what it is about this game that jinxes me.
Thevshi Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 And bad rolls continue, hopefully he's flat footed. I don't know what it is about this game that jinxes me.
Thevshi Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 And bad rolls continue, hopefully he's flat footed. I don't know what it is about this game that jinxes me.
Veiled Malice Posted February 9, 2008 Author Posted February 9, 2008 Probably did, but something went wrong with the tag. I can't see the roll. What was it?
Veiled Malice Posted February 9, 2008 Author Posted February 9, 2008 Probably did, but something went wrong with the tag. I can't see the roll. What was it?
Veiled Malice Posted February 9, 2008 Author Posted February 9, 2008 Probably did, but something went wrong with the tag. I can't see the roll. What was it?
Thevshi Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 Made a bluff check (or diplomacy, as their the same) and got a 19. That roll is without her +8 from 2 ranks of Attractive, so if that factors in, it would be a 27 :)
Recommended Posts